Analyzing penalty performance
I'm thinking we should respond to the user with a clarifying question while providing some analysis. I can mention that missing two penalties is a small sample size, especially since average conversion rates in top leagues are around 75-80%. If the player keeps missing, the coach might need to reconsider who takes penalties.
I can also highlight that non-penalty goals indicate better open-play scoring. For Golden Boot races, penalties can add considerable goals, so without them, the player could be at a disadvantage.
Let’s suggest improvements and alternatives for penalty-taking strategies!
看点够足，但结论别下太快。
- 两次罚丢样本太小。五大联赛平均点球命中率约75–80%，连丢两球更多是波动，未必代表长期水平。
- 若球队因此收回点球权，确实更利于“无点球金靴”的叙事，但对总进球数不利——顶级射手一个赛季靠点球通常能多4–8球。
- 评价杀伤力更看非点球数据（NPG、NPxG、禁区内触球、门前一脚质量等）。如果他开放式进球和机会质量都高，拿“无点球金靴”并非不可能。 
- 心理与策略层面：连丢会影响自信。短期可换更稳的主罚者，球员本人在训练里固定助跑、脚背/内侧选择、角度高度组合，赛前做门将倾向作业，别过度读秒。
- 历史参照：联赛金靴不靠点球也能拿（如孙兴慜22球无点球），但总体更难，需要球队创造大量高质量机会支撑。
要不要具体看他所在联赛/球队的定位球分配和他本季的NPG/NPxG？你说下是哪位“瓦科”和哪支队，我给你把数据框起来再判断他争金靴的胜算。