
Avoiding hallucinations in responses
I need to be careful not to assert incorrect details. I can offer the user several choices, like writing a 150-word news brief, expanding to 500 words, or providing scouting profiles, translations, or SEO titles. Asking for preferences would be helpful. I could also draft a short Chinese news piece with a neutral tone, crediting Tuttosport. But I need to avoid making up facts, especially when I'm unsure about names or their origins. It's better to ask what the user wants.Preparing to monitor updates
I can offer to keep an eye on updates without needing to run any shells. First, I need to clarify what the user wants. If they're looking for a quick news brief, I can provide a default 120-character version. It could restate claims about competition, mentioning the January window or summer, but that’s speculative. Using safer phrasing like "According to Tuttosport..." is wise, ensuring I call out that there are no details available while providing essential points. I’ll also suggest a few headline options and key rumor points. Then, I can ask if they’d like a longer piece or profiles.
你想让我怎么处理这条转会线索?可以选一个方向:
- 改写与标题优化
- 150字快讯稿
- 500字扩写稿(含背景与影响)
- 球员速览/球探型简介
- 社媒文案(微博/公众号/推送)

先给你一个简短快讯+可选标题,看看风格是否合适。
可选标题
- 尤文、那不勒斯竞逐蒂亚戈-加布里埃尔与门多萨(都体)
- 都体:尤文与那不勒斯围绕两新人选展开抢夺 
- 意媒:尤文、那不勒斯盯上蒂亚戈-加布里埃尔与门多萨

150字快讯稿 据《都灵体育报》报道,尤文图斯与那不勒斯同时将引援目标对准蒂亚戈-加布里埃尔与门多萨,两队有望在接下来的转会窗口就这两名球员展开直接竞争。报道未披露报价区间与谈判进展,相关团队正评估登陆意甲的可行性与发展空间。尤文希望补强未来储备并优化阵容结构,那不勒斯则在多线作战背景下寻求提升轮换深度。后续动向有待双方进一步动作与市场评估。
需要我补充两位球员的基本信息、技术特征和潜在定位吗?
