Considering team guidelines
I think I could transform team working guidelines into concise bullet points covering principles, anti-patterns, behaviors, metrics, and examples. Maybe it’s useful to craft a short motto or rewrite it sharply! I want to provide a one-pager of operating principles or perhaps consider a commit message, depending on what works best.
Given the general instructions, I’ll suggest three options to proceed and include a refined version alongside an English translation, as well as actionable behaviors and anti-patterns. A quick checklist could be beneficial too!Creating concise team guidelines
I want to provide a tighter slogan along with an English translation. I'll outline five practical behaviors: setting deadlines, focusing on shipping, quantifying "good enough," using a design debt log, and maintaining a decision record. The behaviors include reminders like "Stop polishing after impact flattens" and "Cut scope, not quality."
I’ll also list anti-patterns and propose a lightweight rubric for evaluating decisions, along with a short team ritual. Additionally, I could phrase variations in Chinese and maybe include a prompt to clarify attribution if needed. Let's keep it simple!Producing concise guidelines
I want to create a refined statement along with its English translation. I’ll outline an actionable checklist with five key points and provide four anti-patterns to avoid. Additionally, I plan to include a lightweight scoring card for evaluation. Finally, I'll offer options for next steps to keep things organized.
The focus here is to ensure everything is concise and clear. Okay, I’ll go ahead and deliver this information!
给到位。听起来你在强调“先决断、再美感”，并把它变成团队的共识。
精炼版：少些雕琢，多些决断；把美感交给迭代，先把价值交到用户手里。
英译：Be decisive over aesthetic perfection; everyone can do better by shipping value first and refining later.
可执行做法
- 设定“够好即可”的出货标准：影响达成、可用性OK、无高风险缺陷。
- 每个议题指定DRI与决策时限（如 30/60 分钟），到点拍板并记录理由。 
- 先砍范围不砍质量：保留核心路径，延后装饰细节与稀有场景。
- 用“Ship→Measure→Polish”节奏：上线后1周内安排一次专注美化的迭代。
- 建立设计债/美感待办清单，避免在当前迭代里无止境打磨。
需避免
- 像素级抛光导致延期；无结论的探索轮。
- 共识僵持、所有人都要点头才前进。
- 需求目标不清，导致“好看”替代“有效”。
轻量决策打分（0–2分/项，总分≥5即出手）
- 影响：是否明显提升核心指标？
- 清晰：用户故事与验收标准是否明确？
- 风险：失败代价可控且可回滚？
- 延期成本：再等一周的代价是否更高？
需要我把这句话落成哪种产物？
- 团队原则一页纸
- 决策/评审清单（可打印）
- 对外口号与对内宣导帖（各200字） 选一个或补充你想要的格式。